|
Synergistic
effects of sowing date and potassium nutrition on combating heat stress in
wheat
J. Kaur*, M. Singh
and A.A.S. Gill
Department
of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141 001, India
Received: 01 January
2026
Revised: 04 April
2026
Accepted: 24 July 2026
*Corresponding Author Email : jaskirandeepkaur3253@gmail.com
*ORCiD:
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8405-613X
|
|
|
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to
enhance wheat productivity under heat stress by management of sowing date and
application of potassium.
Methodology: Field experiment in
split plot design was conducted to study interactive effects of two sowing
dates (early sowing (ES) on 30th October and late sowing (LS) on
30th November) and two soil K rates (no K (K0) and 25
kg K ha-1 (K25) in main plots and five foliar K sprays
(control, 2 % KCl at booting (KCl-B) and anthesis (KCl-A), booting +
anthesis (KCl A+B) and 2% KNO3 at booting + anthesis (KNO3
A+B) in subplots to mitigate heat stress in wheat.
Results: Relative leaf
water, chlorophyll content, evapotranspiration, apparent water productivity
and water use efficiency of wheat were significantly increased by 25.1, 23.2,
22.9, 23.3 and 17.6 per cent, respectively, with ESK25 compared to
LSK0. Physiological traits increased while proline content
decreased significantly with ESK25. However, these parameters were
at par in ESK0 and LSK25, but significantly different
than LSK0. Foliar spray of KClB+A or KNO3 B+A
significantly increased these parameters compared to control. Grain yield of
wheat was significantly and positively correlated with all these parameters,
except proline content.
Interpretation: The study confirms
that early sowing, soil application and foliar feeding of K protects wheat
from heat stress.
Key
words:
Heat stress, Potassium management, Sowing date, Synergism, Wheat
|
|
|
Copyright © 2026 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be
reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility
regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the
conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).
|
|