Google Search the Journal web-site:
|
Abstract - Issue Jul 2026, 47 (4) Back
nstantaneous and historical temperature effects on a-pinene
|
Generation
mean analysis to elucidate predominant gene effects and interrelationships of
yield and contributing traits in chickpea under irrigated conditions
S.A. Shendekar1,
N.S. Kute1*, Banoth Madhu2, A.S. Totre3,
P.L. Kulwal4 and G.C. Shinde1
1Department
of Agricultural Botany (Genetics and Plant Breeding), Mahatma Phule Krishi
Vidyapeeth, Rahuri- 413 722, India
2Department
of Genetics and Plant Breeding, School of Agriculture, SR University,
Warangal-506 371, India
3Department
of Agricultural Botany (Genetics and Plant Breeding), DUS testing on
Chickpea, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri- 413 722, India
4Department
of Agricultural Botany (Genetics and Plant Breeding), State Level
Biotechnology Center, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri- 413 722, India
Received: 05 May
2025 Revised: 03 September 2025 Accepted:
28 February 2026
*Corresponding Author Email: nskute2019@gmail.com
*ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4259-3126
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
Aim: The study aimed to
estimate the gene action for yield and its components in chickpea through
generation mean analysis and assess variability and trait interrelationships.
Methodology: The experiment was
conducted at the Pulses Improvement Project, Department of Genetics and Plant
Breeding, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, India in Rabi
2023-24. The study used six generations (P1, P2, F1,
F2, BC1, & BC2) from two crosses: Phule
Vikram × ICC 4958 and RVG 202 × BGM 10216.
Results: The adequacy of the
additive-dominance model was assessed using the joint scaling test.
Significant results for all traits, except NPBP (No. of primary branches per
plant) in Cross I, indicated model applicability. The dominance component
exceeded the additive for most traits like NPP (No. of pods per plant) and
100SW (100 seed weight) in both the crosses, and DFF (days to 50% flowering),
NPBP, SYP (seed yield per plant), BY (biomass per plant) and HI (harvest
index) in Cross I. Both additive and non-additive gene actions contributed
significantly. Implications for breeding strategies were discussed based on
the type of gene action observed. Higher PCV (phenotypic coefficient of
variation) than GCV (genotypic coefficient of variation) indicated environmental
influence. Moderate heritability, genetic advance, and high heterosis for SYP
were observed. Strong correlations between SYP and key yield components
suggest that simultaneous selection for these traits can enhance chickpea
productivity.
Interpretation: Identifying gene
action and variability aids breeders in applying selection strategies,
guiding breeding programs for development of high-yielding chickpea
cultivars.
Key
words:
Agronomic traits, Chickpea, Gene action, Generation mean analysis
|
|
|
Copyright © 2026 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be
reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility
regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the
conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).
|
|
|
|
|
|