|
Copulatory behaviour,
copulation process and cocoon biology in earthworms–A review
P.S. Chaudhuri* and
A. Dey
Department
of Zoology, Tripura University (A Central University), Suryamaninagar - 799
022, India
Received: 14 August 2024
Revised: 08 November 2024 Accepted: 20 January
2025
*Corresponding Author Email : drpsc1957@gmail.com
*ORCiD:
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8906-0306
|
|
|
Abstract
Earthworms,
despite having both female and male reproductive systems in the same
individual (hermaphrodite), generally practice cross-fertilization. This is
due to the fact that in earthworms, the testis matures earlier than the
ovary. So, they generally do not undergo self-fertilization. The occurrence
of parthenogenesis is not rare in earthworms. Probable involvement of
extensive courtship behaviour involving repeated short touches with sensory
prostomium of the copulating partners was recorded in Lumbricidae. During
conjugation, the partners lie close together with their ventral body parts,
keeping their heads in opposite directions. During sperm transfer, the
spermathecal aperture of one individual makes intimate contact with the male
genital aperture of the corresponding partner.
The
mucus secretion from the clitellar section covers the opposing partners.
Copulation lasts for about one hour. The worms move backwards, drawing the
‘slime secretion tube’ over the head. When the earthworms are entirely free,
the ends of the tube close to form the cocoon. The shape of the cocoon is
genus-specific. But its development time varies with species.This paper aims
to review the process of copulation, cocoon formation, morphology, breeding
strategies, neurosecretory control of copulation and cocoon production in
earthworms.
Key
words: Cocoon
formation, Earthworms, Hermaphroditism, Neurosecretory cell, Parthenogenesis,
Reproductive strategy
|
|
|
Copyright © 2025 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be
reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility
regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the
conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).
|
|