|
Authors
Info
R. Jain*, A. Singh, S.P. Singh,
A. Chandra and A.D. Pathak
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
Division ICAR-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research,
Lucknow-226 002, India
*Corresponding
Author Email :
radha_dinesh@yahoo.co.in
|
Abstract
Aim: The present
investigation was carried out to study root anatomy of sugarcane cultivars
(CoLk 94184 and CoJ64) planted under waterlogged condition through Scanning
Electron Microscopy (SEM).
Methodology: Two sugarcane (Saccharum
spp. hybrid) cultivars, CoLk 94184 and CoJ 64 were evaluated for changes in
root anatomy in response to waterlogging during 2017-2018. For waterlogging
treatment, crop was grown in deep plot which was waterlogged upto a depth of
1 m during active grand growth stage (monsoon season) along with untreated
control plot. After three months of waterlogging, the plants were uprooted to
study the root morphology and anatomy through SEM.
Results: Waterlogged
plants showed aerial root formation in both the cultivars but number and mass
were higher in CoJ64. Aerenchyma was formed in the cortical region of both
control and waterlogging roots but the size was relatively increased in
waterlogged. Irregular and damaged surface cells with longer root hairs were
observed in waterlogging treatment. Waterlogged roots exhibited cell
distortion, loss of uniformity in endodermis and pericycle regions and higher
number of metaxylem vessels.
Interpretation: The study
concluded that waterlogging treatment caused structural anomalies and induced
anatomical and surface ultra-structural changes in both the cultivars, but
the level of deformation was relatively higher in genotype CoJ 64, indicating
sensitivity towards waterlogging as compared to cultivar CoLk 94184.
Key words: Abiotic stress, Anatomical aberrations, Root anatomy,
Sugarcane, Waterlogging
|
|
Copyright
? 2019 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can
be reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility regarding
the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the conclusions
enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).
|