|
Water
quality assessment of Kavvayi Lake of northern Kerala, India using CCME water
quality index and biological water quality criteria
M.
Shiji, A.R. Sabitha, Kavya Prabhakar and P.S. Harikumar*
Water Quality
Division, Centre for Water Resources Development and Management,
Kozhikode-673 571, India
*Corresponding
Author E-mail: drpshari@yahoo.co.in
|
|
Publication
Data
Paper received:
10 September 2015
Revised received:
11 December 2015
Re-revised received:
18 January 2016
Accepted:
19 March 2016
|
Abstract
Assessment
of water quality status of 7 sites of Kavvayi Wetland in northern Kerala
(India) was carried out. The physico-chemical, bacteriological and biological
parameters were monitored during pre-monsoon, monsoon and post-monsoon
seasons. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) water
quality index of the Kavvayi Lake samples ranged from 43.99-44.77; indicating
that water quality was threatened or impaired. The poor water quality status
might be due to dumping of wastes from municipal and domestic sources and
agricultural runoff. Biological water quality criteria (BWQC) determined for
wetland revealed that stations such as mixing point of Kariangode River into
Kavvayi Lake and Kottikkadavu was moderately polluted in pre-monsoon and
post- monsoon seasons. Mixing point of Nileswar River into Kavvayi Lake was
moderately polluted in pre-monsoon season. Both calculated indices suggest
that quality of lake was found to be influenced by anthropogenic activities
such as unscientific tourism and infrastructure development, land
encroachment, sand mining, pollution etc. The study was carried out as part
of a programme, which aimed to conserve Kavvayi wetland because of its unique
ecological and environmental characteristics.
Key
words
Bacterial
analysis, Biological water quality criteria, CCME water quality index,
Kavvayi Wetland
|
|
Copyright
? 2016 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can
be reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility
regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the
conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).
|