|
Comparative
study on oviposition and larval preference of spotted bollworm, Earias
vittella on Bt and non-Bt cotton
P.S.
Shera* and Ramesh Arora
Department of
Entomology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141 004, India
Corresponding Author
E-mail : psshera@pau.edu
|
|
Publication
Data
Paper received:
09 December 2014
Revised received:
29 April 2015
Accepted:
05 June 2015
|
Abstract
Oviposition
and larval preference of spotted bollworm, Earias vittella (Fabricius)
was assessed on four transgenic Bt cotton hybrids, viz. MRC 6304 Bt (cry1Ac
gene), JKCH 1947 Bt (modified cry1Ac gene), NCEH 6R Bt (cry1Ab/cry1Ac
fused gene) and MRC 7017 BG II (cry1Ac and cry2Ab genes) in
comparison to the respective isogenic cotton. The results showed that Bt
toxin did not deter oviposition preference of E. vittella moths as
there was no significant difference in the number of eggs laid on
squares/bolls of Bt and non-Bt cotton hybrids, across different crop growth
stages. There was also no behavioral change in larval preference with respect
to selecting non-Bt cotton in comparison to Bt cotton. Floral bodies from Bt
and the respective isogenic cotton genotypes were equally preferred by both
first and third instar larvae after 24 hrs indicating that initial selection
was independent of susceptibility to Bt toxin. However, E. vittella
larvae showed significant difference in preference for different cotton
genotypes. Studies on the relative preference indicated that third instar
larvae had greater preference for bolls (7.29-7.50%) than for the squares
(5.0-5.21%) and reverse was true for the first instar larvae which showed
greater preference for squares (7.08-7.29%) than for the bolls (5.21-5.42%),?
in a multiple-choice test. It may be concluded that oviposition and larval
preference of E. vittella did not differ significantly between Bt and
isogenic non-Bt cotton genotypes. ???
Key
words
Bt
cotton, Earias vittella, Larval preference, Oviposition, Spotted
bollworm
|
|
Copyright
? 2016 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can
be reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility
regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the
conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).
|