nstantaneous and historical temperature effects on a-pinene
Effect of sodium nitroprusside
on morphological characters
under
chilling stress in chickpea (Cicerarietinum L.)
Author Details
AbhaChohan
Department
of Botany, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana - 141 004, India
UshaParmar
Department
of Botany, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana - 141 004, India
S.K.
Raina
(Corresponding author)
Division
of Soil Science, Sher-e-Kashmir University of
Agricultural Sciences and
Technology
of Kashmir, Shalimar Srinagar -191 121, India
e-mail: sanjayraina11@gmail.com
Publication Data
Paper received:
28
September 2010
Revised
received:
10
March 2011
Re-revised
received:
20
April 2011
Accepted:
26 May 2011
Abstract
An experiment was conducted with chilling tolerant
(IC-424234) and sensitive (PBG-1) chickpea (Cicerarietinum L.) genotypes to study the effect of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) ? nitric oxide donor applied as
foliar spray of 150 and 300 ?M concentrations at 45 DAS (vegetative stage),
85 DAS (flowering stage) and 125 DAS (post flowering stage). Both the
concentrations of SNP (150 and 300 ?M) resulted in significant increase in
all the morphological characters viz. plant height, number of leaves plant-1,
leaf area plant-1 and leaf area index (LAI) over the control at
all the stages, though lower concentration (150 ?M) was more effective.
Chilling sensitive (CS) genotype PBG-1 responded more effectively to SNP
treatment. Electrolyte leakage percentage was effectively reduced by SNP
treatments in both the genotypes at low temperature (15 DAA). Chilling
sensitive genotype PBG-1 treated with SNP (150 ?M)? recorded significantly higher yield contributing
characters viz. number of pods plant-1, number of seeds pod-1,
seed yield plant-1(g), pod setting percentage (%), 100 seed weight
(g) and yield (kg ha-1) over the chilling tolerant (IC-424234). ?
Copyright ? 2012 Triveni Enterprises. All
rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be reproduced in any form without
prior permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity of the data,
and the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely
with the author(s).