|
Journal of Environmental BiologypISSN: 0254-8704 ; eISSN: 2394-0379 ; CODEN: JEBIDP |
|
Google Search the Journal web-site: |
Abstract - Issue Jan 2009, 30 (1) BackKinetic comparison of microbial assemblages for the anaerobic
treatment of wastewater with high sulfate and heavy metal contents Nusara Sinbuathong*1, Pramote
Sirirote2, Winai
Liengcharernsit3, Sutha
Khaodhiar4 and Daniel J. Watts5 1Scientific 2Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, 3Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, 4Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, 5Otto H. York Center for Environmental Engineering and Science, New
Jersey Institute of Technology, New (Received: January 24, 2007; Revised received: June 10,2008; Accepted: June
27, 2008) Abstract: Mixed-microbial assemblages enriched
from a septic tank, coastal sediment samples, the digester sludge of a brewery
wastewater treatment plant and acidic sulfate soil samples were compared on the
basis of growth rate, waste and sulfate reduction rate under sulfate reducing
conditions at 30oC. The
specific growth rate of various cultures was in the range 0.0013-0.0022 hr-1.
Estimates of waste and sulfate reduction rate were obtained by fitting
substrate depletion and sulfate reduction data with the Michaelis-Menten
equation. The waste reduction rates were in the range 4x10-8-1x10-7
l mg-1hr-1
and generally increased in the presence of copper, likely by copper sulfide
precipitation that reduced sulfide and copper toxicity and thus protected the
anaerobic microbes. Anaerobic
microorganisms from a brewery digester sludge were
found to be the most appropriate culture for the treatment of wastewater with
high sulfate and heavy metal content due to their growth rate, and waste and
sulfate reduction rate. Key
words: Anaerobic digestion, Brewery wastewater, Copper,
Kinetics, Mixed microbial culture, Sulfate reducing condition PDF of full length paper is available
with author (*rdinrs@ku.ac.th) Copyright © 2009 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be reproduced in any
form without prior permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity
of the data, and the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest
completely with the author(s). |