![]() |
Journal of Environmental BiologypISSN: 0254-8704 ; eISSN: 2394-0379 ; CODEN: JEBIDP |
Google Search the Journal web-site: |
Abstract - Issue Jan 2009, 30 (1) BackBiosurfactant
production in sugar beet molasses by some Pseudomonas spp. Dilsad
Onbasli*1 and Belma
Aslim2 1Deparment
of Biology, Faculty of Science and Arts, 2Department
of Biology, Faculty of Science and Arts, (Received: September
22, 2007; Revised received: February 04, 2008; Accepted: March 10, 2008) Abstract: In this study, rhamnolipid
biosurfactant production was investigated in eighteen
strains of Pseudomonas spp.. Rhamnolipid by these strains
was determined by a spectrophotometric method in
nutrient broth medium (NB). From the 18 strains screened, two Pseudomonas
strains (Pseudomonas luteola B17 and Pseudomonas putida B12) which had produced the highest percentage yield
of rhamnolipid were examined for rhamnolipid
production at different incubation times (24, 48 and 72 hr) and different sugar
beet molasses concentrations [1-5 % w/v concentration (1-5 g molasses/100 ml
water)]. The rhamnolipid production increased with
the increase in the concentration of molasses and maximum production occurred
when 5 % (w/v) of molasses were used. At the same time, maximum rhamnolipid production occurred after 72 hr of incubation.
When the amount of rhamnolipid produced at different
incubation times (24, 48 and 72 hr) and with different concentrations of
molasses [1-5 % w/v concentration (1-5 g molasses/100 ml water)] by Pseudomonas
spp.; was compared, no significant difference in
amount of production was seen. These studies show that the waste product from
sugar industry may be suggested for important biotechnological processes such
as rhamnolipid production. Key words: Pseudomonas spp., Rhamnolipid, Sugar beet molasses PDF of full length paper is available with author (*donbasili@kastamonu.edu.tr) Copyright ? 2009 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be reproduced in any
form without prior permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity
of the data, and the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest
completely with the author(s). |