|
Journal of Environmental BiologypISSN: 0254-8704 ; eISSN: 2394-0379 ; CODEN: JEBIDP |
|
Google Search the Journal web-site: |
Abstract - Issue Jan 2009, 30 (1) BackContributions
of available substrates and activities of trophic
microbial community to methanogenesis in vegetative
and reproductive rice rhizospheric soil Sansanee Chawanakul1,3, Pawinee Chaiprasert*2, Sirintornthep Towprayoon1 and Morakot Tanticharoen4 1The Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment (JGSEE), King Mongkut’s 2School of Bioresources and Technology,
King Mongkut’s 83 Moo 8, Thakham, Bangkhuntien, 3Department of Biological Science, Faculty of Science, Warin Chamrab District, Ubon Ratchathani.
34190, Klong
Luang, (Received:
April 05, 2008; Revised received: July 05, 2008; Accepted:August 28, 2008) Abstract: Potential of methane production and trophic microbial activities at rhizospheric
soil during rice cv. Supanburi
1 cultivation were determined by laboratory anaerobic diluents vials. The
methane production was higher from rhizospheric than
non-rhizospheric soil, with the noticeable peaks
during reproductive phase (RP) than vegetative phase (VP). Glucose, ethanol and
acetate were the dominant available substrates found in rhizospheric
soil during methane production at both phases. The predominance activities of trophic microbial consortium in methanogenesis,
namely fermentative bacteria (FB), acetogenic
bacteria (AGB), acetate utilizing bacteria (AB) and acetoclastic
methanogens (AM) were also determined. At RP, these
microbial groups were enhanced in the higher of methane production than VP.
This correlates with our finding that methane production was greater at the rhizospheric soil with the noticeable peaks during RP
(1,150 ± 60 nmol g dw-1
d-1) compared with VP (510 ± 30 nmol g dw-1 d-1). The high number of AM
showed the abundant (1.1x104 cell g dw-1)
with its high activity at RP, compared to the less activity with AM number at
VP (9.8x102 cell g dw-1).
Levels of AM are low in the total microbial population, being less than 1% of
AB. These evidences revealed that the microbial consortium of these two phases
were different. Key
words: Acetoclastic
methanogens, Methane production, Rice rhizospheric soil, Trophic
microbial consortium PDF of full length paper is available
with author (*pawinee.cha@kmutt.ac.th; pawinee@pdti.kmutt.ac.th) Copyright © 2009 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be reproduced in any
form without prior permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity
of the data, and the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest
completely with the author(s). |