|
Journal of Environmental BiologypISSN: 0254-8704 ; eISSN: 2394-0379 ; CODEN: JEBIDP |
|
Google Search the Journal web-site: |
Abstract - Issue Jan 2009, 30 (1) BackNitrogen fixation capacity of Azotobacter
spp.
strains isolated from soils in different ecosystems and relationship between
them and the microbiological properties of soils Ridvan
Kizilkaya* Department
of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, (Received:
August 11, 2007; Revised received: December 28, 2007; Accepted: January 10,
2008) Abstract: The objectives of this study were to
count and culture Azotobacter spp.
in sampled soils, to determine the nitrogen (N) fixing capacity by Azotobacter spp. in pure culture
and different soils, and to explore the relationships between N fixation capacity
of Azotobacter spp. and
microbiological properties of soils in Northern Anatolia, Turkey. Statistically
significant relationships were found between the population of Azotobacter spp. in soils and
microbial biomass C (Cmic), dehydrogenase (DHA), b-glucosidase (GA),
alkaline phosphatase (APA) and arylsulphatase
(ASA) activities. However, relationships between the population of Azotobacter spp. and basal soil
respiration (BSR), urease (UA) and catalase (CA) activities were insignificant. The N fixation
capacities of native 3 day old Azotobacter chroococcum strains added to Ashby Media varied from 3.50
to 29.35 mg N ml-1 on average 10.24. In addition, N fixation
capacities of Azotobacter spp.
strains inoculated with clayey soil, loam soil, and sandy clay loam soil during
eight week incubation period were 4.78-15.91 mg N g-1, 9.03-13.47
mg N g-1? and 6.51-16.60 mg N g-1,
respectively. It was concluded that the most N fixation by Azotobacter
spp. was in sandy clay loam soils. Key words: Azotobacter spp., Soil, Texture, N fixation, Microbiological properties PDF of full length paper is available
with author (*ridvank@omu.edu.tr) Copyright ? 2009 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be reproduced in any
form without prior permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity
of the data, and the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest
completely with the author(s). |