JEB logo

Journal of Environmental Biology

pISSN: 0254-8704 ; eISSN: 2394-0379 ; CODEN: JEBIDP

About Journal
    Home
    Obituary: Dr. R. C. Dalela
    Editorial Board
    Reviewer Panel
    Publication Policies
    Guidelines for Editors
    Guidelines for Reviewers
    Abstracting and Indexing
    Subscription and Payments
    Contact Journal
    About Triveni Enterprises
 
Read Journal
    Current Issue
    Journal Archives
 
For Authors
    Guidelines for Authors
    Terms and Conditions
    Author Resources
    Fees and Payments
    Track Paper Status
 

Google Search the Journal web-site:


    Abstract - Issue Nov 2008, 29 (6)                                     Back


Interactions between marine facultative epiphyte Chlamydomonas sp

Pesticide usage pattern in tea ecosystem, their retrospects

and alternative measures

G. Gurusubramanian*1,  A. Rahman2, M. Sarmah2, Somnath Ray3 and S. Bora2

1Department of Zoology, Mizoram Central University, Tanhril, Aizawl - 796 001, India

2Plant Protection Division, Department of Entomology, Tocklai Experimental Station,

Tea Research Association, Jorhat - 785 008, India

3Entomology Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of North Bengal, Darjeeling - 734 430, India

(Received: November 07, 2006; Revised received: May 28, 2007; Accepted: June 27, 2007)

Abstract: Tea is a perennial plantation crop grown under monoculture providing favorable conditions for a variety of pests. The concept of pest control has undergone a considerable change over the past few decades. In recent years there has been a greater dependence on the use of pesticides (7.35 -16.75 kgha-1) with little importance laid on other safe control methods for the management of tea pests. Due to this practice, the tea pests showed a higher tolerance/ resistance status due to formation of greater amount of esterases, glutathione S-transferase and acetylcholinesterase. Thus, over reliance on pesticides end up with pesticide residue in made tea (DDT – 10.4 – 47.1%; endosulfan – 41.1 – 98.0%; dicofol – 0.0 – 82.4%; ethion – 0.0 – 36.2%; cypermethrin – 6.0 – 45.1%). The growing concern about the pesticide residue in made tea, its toxicity hazards to consumers, the spiraling cost of pesticides and their application have necessitated a suitable planning which will ensure a safe, economic as well as effective pest management in tea. At present it is a global concern to minimize chemical residue in tea and European union and German law imposed stringent measures for the application of chemicals in tea and fixed MRL values at  < 0.1 mgkg-1 for the most commonly used pesticides which will not be met out in the real practice and has been a major constraint to tea exporting countries like India. In order to regulate the situation of the Indian market at global level, central insecticide board and prevention of food adulteration regulation committee have reviewed the MRL position for tea and has recommended 10 insecticides, 5 acaricides, 9 herbicides and 5 fungicides for use in tea and issued the tea distribution and export control order 2005 which will help the country to limit the presence of undesirable substances in tea. This review attempts to provide the readers with a comprehensive account of pesticide use in North East in tea, surveillance report of the European community regarding the residue level in Assam and Darjeeling tea, recent amendments by international and national regulatory bodies, revised MRL values of pesticides in tea, an update about the current strategies for the management of tea pests with more focus on the use of biological control agents and a possible beneficial role or judicious use of chemical pesticides in complement with other alternative measures to achieve optimum effects in terms of limiting agricultural input, lowering production costs, reducing environmental contamination and the effect on non-target organisms, delaying the development of resistant pest biotypes and above all minimizing the pesticide residues in tea to increase the exports.

Key words:    Pesticide use, Pesticide residues, MRL, Pesticide regulation, IPM, Bio-control agents, Alternative measures

PDF of full length paper is available with author (*gurus64@yahoo.com)

 

Copyright © 2008 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be reproduced in any form without prior permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).

Â