|
Analysis of the
areas suitable for ecotourism using Geographical Information Systems: Example
of Narman District (Erzurum) Turkey
????????????????????
E. Akpınar
K?lek?i1*and A. Ko?2?
1Faculty of
Architecture and Design, Department of Landscape Architecture, Ataturk
University, Yakutiye- Erzurum, 25240, Turkey
2Dicle University,
Diyarbakır Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Department of Park
and Garden Plants, Diyarbakır, 21000, Turkey
*Corresponding Author Email : eakpinar@atauni.edu.tr
|
|
Abstract
Aim: To
protect and use the existing natural and cultural resources of Narman
district with a sustainable tourism perspective and evaluate an
environmentally sensitive tourism planning approach.
Methodology: Natural and cultural resource values of the district
were measured using Arc GIS 10.2 from GIS (Geographical Information Systems)
software. For this purpose, elevation, accessibility, proximity to river and
stream water beds, geological structure, fauna, slope, drainage, large soil
groups and land use maps were drawn and their suitability values were
determined. The data obtained was analyzed using map overlaying and
appropriate areas for potential ecotourism of the area; the coverage rates
were also determined and mapped.
Results : This study revealed that 9027 hectares (7.08 %) of
the district are quite appropriate for such activities, 79050 hectares are
(62%) appropriate, 33379,5 hectares (26.18%) are less appropriate and 6043
hectares (4.74 %) are not appropriate.
Interpretation: This study showed that Narman Fairy
Chimneys and their immediate vicinity, high mountainous and rocky areas as
well as valley plains, areas near the rivers and stream water beds and forest
areas have important potential for ecotourism.
Key words: Ecotourism, Geographical Information System, Narman
(Erzurum), Suitability Analysis, Turkey
|
|
Copyright
? 2020 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of
the Journal can be reproduced in any form without prior
permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity of the data, and
the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely
with the author(s).
|
|