S.E.
Shinde
(Corresponding author)
|
Department of Zoology, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University,
Aurangabad - 431 004, India
e-mail: sunilshinde1004@rediffmail.com
|
Publication Data
Paper received:
13
December 2010
Revised
received:
25
April 2011
Re-revised
received:
02
May 2011
Re-re-revised
received:
23
May 2011
Accepted:
14 June 2011
|
Abstract
The present study concerns seasonal variations,
correlation coefficient and biodiversity indices of zooplanktons during
January ? December, 2008 in the Harsool-Savangi
dam, Aurangabad, India. A total of 25 genera were recorded of which 10 were
Rotifers, 8 Cladocerons, 5 Copepods and 2 Ostracods. Present study revealed maximum percentage wise
compositions of Rotifers at north site were 58.28%, Cladocerons
at south site were 29.78%, Copepods at east site were 16.59% and Ostracods at south site were 4.20%, respectively. Minimum
percentage wise compositions Rotifers at south site were 51.54%, Cladocerons at west site were 26.71%, Copepods at north
site were 11.03% and Ostracods at north site were
1.36%, respectively. Margalef?s index (R1)
and Menhinick index (R2) values (3.58
and 0.87) were found to be the highest at south site and lowest at (3.16 and
0.56) north site. Simpson?s index (l) values (0.43) were found to be the
highest at north site and lowest (0.37) at south site. Shannon ? Weiner index
(H?) values (1.06) were found to be the highest at south site and lowest
values (0.94) at north site. Maximum species evenness was recorded at south
site while minimum species evenness was recorded at north site. Maximum
population density of Rotifers, Cladocerons,
Copepods and Ostracods (799, 350, 163 and 18) were
recorded at north site in summer and minimum (58, 35, 22 and 13) were
recorded at south site in monsoon, respectively.? ?
Key words
Zooplankton,
Biodiversity indices, Seasonal variations, Harsool-Savangi
dam
|
Copyright ? 2012 Triveni Enterprises. All
rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be reproduced in any form without
prior permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity of the data,
and the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely
with the author(s).
|