JEB logo

Journal of Environmental Biology

pISSN: 0254-8704 ; eISSN: 2394-0379 ; CODEN: JEBIDP

About Journal
    Editor in Chief
    Editorial Board
    Reviewer Panel
    Publication Policies
    Guidelines for Editors
    Guidelines for Reviewers
    Abstracting and Indexing
    Subscription and Payments
    Contact Journal
Read Journal
    Current Issue
    Journal Archives
For Authors
    Guidelines for Authors
    Terms and Conditions
    Fees and Payments
    Track Paper Status
    JEB Awards

Google Search the Journal web-site:

    Abstract - Issue Mar 2009, 30 (3)                                     Back

Interactions between marine facultative epiphyte Chlamydomonas sp

Bioconcentration of heavy metals in selected medicinal plants of India

G. Agoramoorthy1, F.A. Chen1, V. Venkatesalu2 and P.C. Shea*1

1Department of Pharmacy, Tajen University, Yanpu, Pingtung-907, Taiwan

2Department of Botany, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar - 608 002, India

(Received: September 20, 2007; Revised received: November 20, 2007; Accepted: February 05, 2008)

Abstract: This paper presents data on the bioconcentration of heavy metals found in 10 plant species that occur in mangroves and inland ecosystems of India. The average concentration of mercury in the mangrove plants (0.068 mg g-1) was 11.3 times that of the inland plants (0.006 mg g-1; p<0.05). The average concentration of lead in the mangrove plants (19.23 mg g-1) was 1.7 times that of the inland plants (11.38 mg g-1; p<0.05). The mean bioconcentration factors for lead in mangrove plants (2.40 Ī 0.75) were higher than that the inland plants (1.42 Ī 0.15). The factor analysis accounted for 21.55% of the total variance showed accumulation of mercury and lead confirming the polluted nature.

Key words: Mangroves, Medicinal plant, Heavy metal, Pollution, Environment, India

PDF of full length paper is available with author (*


Copyright © 2009 Triveni Enterprises. All rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be reproduced in any form without prior permission.¬†Responsibility regarding the authenticity of the data, and the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely with the author(s).