nstantaneous and historical temperature effects on a-pinene
Distribution of enteric
bacteria in the sediments of
Parangipettai and Cuddalore coast of India
Author Details
P. Murugesan
(Corresponding author)
Centre
of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences, Annamalai University,
Parangipettai - 608 502, India
e-mail: murugesaan74@rediffmail.com
K. Revathi
Centre
of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences, Annamalai University, Parangipettai
- 608 502, India
S. Elayaraja
Centre
of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences, Annamalai University, Parangipettai
- 608 502, India
S. Vijayalakshmi
Centre
of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences, Annamalai University, Parangipettai
- 608 502, India
T. Balasubramanian
Centre
of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences, Annamalai University, Parangipettai
- 608 502, India
Publication Data
Paper received:
21
October 2010
Revised
received:
10
March 2011
Re-revised
received:
18
April 2011
Accepted:
23 April 2011
Abstract
Distribution of major groups of enteric bacteria viz.,
Escherichia coli, Shigellaspp., Salmonellaspp., Vibrioparahaemolyticus
and Vibriocholerae
was studied in the sediment samples collected from different depths of 5, 15,
25 and 35 m in Parangipettai and Cuddalore coast during March, 2009 to February, 2010.
Among the bacterial population in Parangipettai, V.
parahaemolyticus was found to be maximum with an occurrence of 55% followed by Shigellaspp. (15%), V.
cholerae (12%), Salmonellaspp. (12%) and E. coli (6%). In Cuddalore, as an oddity, Vibriocholerae emerged as dominant species with an
incidence of 60% of the total. V. parahaemolyticuscame next in the order with an incidence of 14%, followed by E.coli (11%),Shigellaspp. (8%) and Salmonellaspp.
(7%). Similarly, monsoon and premonsoon seasons
registered higher bacterial populations in both the regions. When the depth
wise results were viewed, 5 and 15 m depths showed maximum (V. parahaemolyticus 3.7x 10 CFU g-1 in Parangipettai; V. cholera - 8.6x10 CFU g-1
in Cuddalore) bacterial population compared to
subsequent depths. Cluster and MDS also showed distinct spatial and seasonal
variations of bacterial populations in both the regions. Biota-Environment
(BIO - ENV) method revealed the combinations of temperature, salinity and TOC
as the best match influencing bacterial population.
Key words
BIO-ENV
method, Enteric bacteria, In-shore waters, PRIMER, Total organic carbon?
Copyright ? 2012 Triveni Enterprises. All
rights reserved. No part of the Journal can be reproduced in any form without
prior permission. Responsibility regarding the authenticity of the data,
and the acceptability of the conclusions enforced or derived, rest completely
with the author(s).